Interpretive Booklet

Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah


Annear, R., & Grant, R. (1992).Walpole-NornalupNational Park Management Plan 1992-2002. Como: National Parks andNature Conservation Authority.

Armstrong, E.K., and Weiler, B. (2002). Getting the Message Across: An Analysis of Messages Delivered by Tour Operators in Protected Areas. Journal of Ecotourism. Vol. 1, Nos. 2 & 3, pp: 104 – 121. 2002.


Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Beckman, E. (1998). Targeted interpretation: Exploring relationships among visitors' motivations, activities, attitudes, information needs and preferences. Journal of Tourism Studies, 9(2), 14-25.

Ballantyne, R. (1998). Interpreting 'visions': Addressing environmental education goals through interpretation. In D. Uzzell and R. Ballantyne (eds) Contemporary Issues in Heritage and Environmental Interpretation. London. The Stationery Office.
Baxter, J. (2001). Personal Communication. 26 July, 2001. Department of CALM.
Bramwell, B. and Lane, B. (1993). Interpretation and sustainable tourism: The potential and the pitfalls. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 1 (2), 71 - 80.

Beckmann, E. (1987). Interpretation in Australia – current status and future prospects, AustralianParks and Recreation 23 (6): 6-14.

Beckmann, E. (1990). Evaluation of Interpretive Services and Facilities – KakaduNational Park. AustralianNational Parks and Wildlife Service, Canberra.

Beckmann, E.A (2003). Listening between the lines: Research-based knowledge to support the development of interpretive text in Interpreting The Land Down Under: Australian Heritage Interpretation and Tour Guiding. Fulcrum Publishing Golden, Colorodo.

Bitgood, S. (2000). The Role of Attention in Designing Effective Interpretive Labels. Journal of Interpretation Research. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 31-45.

Beck, L., (2001). “ What is the Essence of Our Professional Responsibility?”
Cole, D.N., HAmmond, T.P. and McCool, S.F. (1997). Information quantity and communication effectiveness: Low Impact messages on wilderness trail-side bulletin boards. Leisure Sciences 19, 59 - 72.

Duncan, G.S. and Martin, S.R. 2002. Comparing the Effectiveness of Interpretive & Sanction Messages for Influencing Wildenerness Visitors' Intended Behavior. International Journal of Wilderness. Vol.8, No. 2, August 2002.

Fakeye, P.C., & Crompton, J.L. (1991). Image differences between prospective, first-time and repeat visitors to the Lower Rio-Grande Valley. Journal of Travel Research, XXX(2) 10-16.

Fakeye, P.C., & Crompton, J.L. (1992). Importance of socialisation to repeat visitation. Annals of Tourism Research, 19(2), 364-370.

Fehrman, K.R., and Fehrmann, C. (2000). Color: The Secret Influence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Fennel, D. (2001). A content analysis of ecotourism definitions. Current Issues in Tourism 4 (5), 403 - 421.

Field, G., & Gough, D. (1998). The art of interpretation. Landscope,Winter, 36-41.

* Gardner, T & McArthur, S. (1996a). Interpretation signs…How Well Do they Really Work? Anevaluation of three interpretive walks in Tasmanian State Forest. Forestry Tasmania, Hobart.

Hermann, N. (1995). The Creative Brain, Insight into creativity, communication, management, education and self-understanding, The Ned Hermann Group.

Hughes, M.J., and Morrison-Saunders. 2002. Impact of Trail-side Interpretive Signs on Visitor Knowledge. Journal of Ecotourism. Vol. 1., Nos. 2 & 3, pp: 122 – 132

Hughes, M., and Morrison-Saunders, A. 2002. Repeat and First Time Visitation in an Experience Specific Context:The Valley of the GiantsTree Top Walk. THE JOURNAL OF TOURISM STUDIES Vol. 13, No. 1, MAY ‘02

Hein, G. (1998). Learning in the Museum. London: Routledge.
Hyun-Kim, B., Pasadeos, Y. and Barban, A (2001). On the Deceptive Effectiveness of Labeled and Unlabeled Adevertorial Formats. Mass Communication & Society, 2001, 4(3), 265 -281.

Garcia, Marelys L., Caldera, CesarI. (1996). "The Effect of Color and Typeface on the Readability of on-line Text," Computer and Industrial Engineering, v31, number 1-2, p519-521.

Jacobson, S.K. (1999). Communication Skills for Conservation Professionals. Island Press, Washington, D.C., Covelo, California.

Johnson, D.R. and Swearington, T.C. (1992). The effectiveness of selected trailside sign texts in dittering off-trail hiking, Paradise meadows, Mount rainer National Park. In H.H. Christensen, D.R. Johnson and M.M., Brooke (eds) Vandalism; Research, Prevention and Social Policy (pp. 103 -119). General Technical report PNW- GTr-293. Portland, OR: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region.

Jurowski, C., Uysal, M., Williams, D.R., & Noe, F.P. (1995). An examination of preferences and evaluations of visitors based on environmental attitudes: Biscayne BayNational Park. Journalof Sustainable Tourism, 3(2), 73-86.

Kellert, S.R. (1996). The Value of Life: Biological Diversity and Human Society. Island Press, Washington, DC; S.R. 1980 American’s attitudes and knowledge of animals. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and natural Resources Conference 45: 111 – 124.

Knopf, R. (1981). “Cognitive Map Formation as a Tool for Facilitating Information Transfer in Interpretive Programming”.

Knudson, D., Cable, T. and Beck, L. (1996). Interpreting Cultural and Natural Resources. State College, PA: Venture Publishing.

Lasswell, H.D (1971). A Pre-view of Policy Sciences. Elsevier, New York.

Levie, W.H. & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 30 (4), 195-232.

Machlis, G. (1986). Interpretive Views: Opinions on Evaluating Interpretation in the National Park Service. Washington DC: National Park and Conservation Association.

Magil l, A. (1995). Multicultural wildland users: A growing communication challenge. The Environmental Professional, 17, 51-54.

Manfredo, M., & Bright, A. (1991). A model for assessing the effects of communication on recreationists. Journal of Leisure Sciences23(1), 1-20.

Marion, J.L., and Reid, S. E. (2007). Minimising Visitor Impacts to Protected Areas: The Efficacy of Low Impact Education Programmes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol. 15 (1), pp: 5 – 27.

Maslow, A.H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. Harper & Row, New York.

McArthur, S. and Hall, C.M. (1996b). Interpretation: principles and practice, Heritage Managementin Australia and New Zealand: The Human Dimension, eds C.M. Hall and S. McArthur. OxfordUniversity Press, Melbourne

McGee, N.G., Loker-Murphy, L., & Uysal, M. (1996). The Australian international pleasure travel market: Motivations from a gendered perspective. Journal of Tourism Studies, 7(1), 45-57.

Meffe, G.K (1997). Biodiversity and base values. Oryx 31(2): 78 – 80.

Meis, S., Joyal, S., & Trites, A. (1995). The U.S. repeat and VFR visitor to Canada: Come again Eh! Journal of Tourism Studies6(1), 27-37.

Moscardo, G. Woods, B. and Pearce, P. (1997). Evaluating the effectiveness of pictorial symbols inReef visitor education, CRC Reef Research Technical Report 15, CRC Reef Research Centre,Townsville.

Moscardo, G. (1998). Interpretation and sustainable tourism: functions, examples and principles. Journal of Tourism Studies,9(1), 2-13.

Moscardo, G., & Woods, B. (2001). The future of interpretive signs. In R.W. Atkins (Ed.), Facing the future using interpretation. Proceedings of 5the World Congress Heritage Interpretation I n t e r n a t i o n a l (pp. 127-133). Collingwood, Vic.: Interpretation Australia Association.

Nelson, R.P. (1987). Publication Design. Fourth Edition. WM.C. Brown Publishers Dubuque, IOWA

O'Loughlin, T. (1996). Walk softly: The ef fectiveness of the Tasmanian minimal impact bushwalking campaign. In C. Michael Hall & Simon McArthur (Eds), Heritage Management in Australia and New Zealand (pp. 82-91). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Oppermann, M. (1998). Destination threshold potential and the law of repeat visitation. Journal of Travel Research, 37(2), 131-137.

Orams, M.B. (1995). Using interpretation to manage nature-based tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 4(2), 81-94.
Packer, J and Ballantyne, R. (2002). Motivational factors and the visitors experience: A Comparison of three sites. Curator, 45 (3), 183-198.

Pearce, P.L. (1991). Analysing tourist attractions. Journal of Tourism Studies, 2(1), 40-55.

Roggenbuck, J.W., and Berrier, D.L. (1982). A comparisons of the effectiveness of two communication strategies in dispersing wilderness campers. Journal of Leisure Research, 14 (1), pp: 77 – 89.

Roggenbuck, J. (1992). Use of persuasion to reduce resource impacts and visitor conflicts. In M. Manfredo (Ed.), Influencing human behaviour: Theory and applications in recreation, tourism, and natural resources management (pp. 199-208). Champaign, Ill.: Sagamore Publishing Company.

Ryan, C. and Dewar, K. (1995). Evaluating the communication process between interpreter and visitor. Tourism Management 16, 295 – 303.

Silverman, L.H. (1997). “Personalizing the Past: A review of the Literature with Implications for Historical Interpretation.”

Stubbs, C.J. (1991). Low –impact recreational practices: Assessing and improving wilderness user knowledge, behavioral intentions and behavior, unpublished MsC Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Department of Forestry, Blacksburg, Virginia.

Sylwester, R., and Joo-Yun Cho. (1992/1993). “What Brain Research Says About Paying Attention"

Thorn, T.F. (1995). Teaching low-impact camping practices to wilderness backpackers: An Evaluation of thrailhead signing and personal contact. Unpublished MSc Thesis, Utah State University, Logan, Utah.

Tubb, K.N. (2003). An Evaluation of Effectiveness of Interpretation within Dartmoor National Park in Reaching Goals of Sustainable Tourism Development. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol.11, No.6. 476-498.

Veverka, J.A. (1994). Interpretive Master Planning. Falcon Press, Helena, MT.

Vogt, C., & Stewart, S. (1998). Affective and cognitive effects of information use over the course of a vacation. Journal ofLeisure Research, 30(4), 498-520.

Weiler, B. and Davis, D. (1993). An exploratory investigation into the roles of the nature-based tour leader. Tourism Management 14 (2), 91-8.

Widner, C. J. and Roggenbuck (1999). Reducing theft of petrified wood at Petrified Forest National Park. Journal of Interpretation Research 5 (1), 1-18.

Winfield. (1996). Saving the giants. Landscope, Spring, 10-16.

Woods, B. and Moscardo, G. (1996). Adding value to tourist operations through interpretation: Is interpretation good for tourism, or tourism good for interpretation? Interpretation in Action, Fifth Annual Interpretation Australia Association Conference, Bendigo

Young, M. (1999). Cognitive maps of nature-based tourists. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(4), 817-839.

* Specific examples of documented evaluation of outdoor interpretation
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah
Fifteen Guiding Principles for Interpreting Nature and Culture:
  1. To spark an interest, interpreters must relate the subject to the lives of the people in their audience.
  2. The purpose of interpretation goes beyond providing information to reveal deeper meaning and truth.
  3. The interpretive presentation - as a work of art - should be designed as a story that informs, entertains, and enlightens.
  4. The purpose of the interpretive story is to inspire and to provoke people to broaden their horizons.
  5. Interpretation should present a complete theme or thesis and address the whole person.
  6. Interpretation for children, teenagers, and seniors - when these comprise uniform groups - should follow fundamentally different approaches.
  7. Every place has a history. Interpreters can bring the past alive to make the present more enjoyable and the future more meaningful.
  8. Technology can reveal the world in exciting new ways. Hpwever, incorporating this technology into the interpretive program must be done with foresight and thoughful care.
  9. Interpreters must concern themselves with the quantity and quality (selection and accuracy) of information presented. Focused, well - researched interpretation will be more powerful than a longer discourse.
  10. Before applying the arts in interpretation, the interpreter must be familiar with basic communication techniques. Quality interpretation depends on the interpreter's knowledge and skills, which must be continually developed over time.
  11. Interpretive writing should address what readers would like to know, with the authority of wisdom and its accompanying humility and care.
  12. The overall interpretive program must be capable of attracting support - financial, volunteer, political, administrative - whatever support is needed for the program to flourish.
  13. Interpretation should instill in people the ability, and the desire, to sense the beauty in their surroundings - to provide spiritual uplift and to encourage resource preservation.
  14. Interpreters can promote optimal experiences through intentional and thoughtful program and facililty design.
  15. Passion is the essential ingredient for powerful and effective interpretation - passion for the resource and for those people who come to be inspired by it.

References:

Beck, L ., and Cable, T. Interpretation for the 21st Century: Fifteen Guiding Principles for Interpreting Nature and Culture. Second Edition.

Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah

OMG! Aku dah pening kepala nak develop questionnaire ni..ingat kan senang, rupanya susah sungguh. Dah la guna Likert Scale ni aku tak reti pulak nak pilih mana satu. EVEN or ODD numbers? Dah banyak dah aku baca sampai nak pecah kepala pun ada..hehehe..eh takde lah..gugur rambut je..

Dari pembacaan aku, kalau kita guna EVEN number, contohnya 6-point, so tak ada org jawab 'nuetral" je memanjang...betul tak? Tapi adalah ahli bijak pandai cakap, satu kelemahan kalau guna EVEN number ni, kita menggalakkan orang tak menjawab soalan yang kita tanya sebab tak puas hati 'neutral' tu tak ada, alahai...manusia biasalah..suka BIAS. Kalau boleh, dia nak jawab semua 'neutral' je sebab tak nak mengecilkan hati kita.Secara kesimpulannya, aku pilihlah ODD number. Tapi antara 5-point atau 7-point? ni satu hal lagi. Menurut lecturer aku dulu, 7-point more varied. Aku kalau boleh nak elak jawapan 'neutral' ataupun 'undecided'. Contohnya seperti di bawah ni:

Which is BETTER?

SMALL NUMBER

LEVEL OF AGREEMENT

ODD NUMBER

EVEN NUMBER

5-POINT LIKERT SCALE

4-POINT LIKERT SCALE

1 – Strongly Disagree

2 – Disagree

3 – Undecided

4 – Agree

5 – Strongly Agree

1 – Strongly Disagree

2 – Disagree

3 – Agree

4 – Strongly Agree

BIG NUMBER

LEVEL OF SATISFACTION

7-POINT LIKERT SCALE

6-POINT LIKERT SCALE

1 – Very Dissatisfied

2 – Moderately Dissatisfied

3 – Slightly Dissatisfied

4 – Neutral

5 – Slightly Satisfied

6 – Moderately Satisfied

7 – Very Satisfied

1 – Very Dissatisfied

2 – Moderately Dissatisfied

3 – Slightly Dissatisfied

4 – Slightly Satisfied

5 – Moderately Satisfied

6 – Very Satisfied

Apa-apalah.

Anyway to myself: chaiyok chaiyok..don't stop! I'm a Princess of Courage, Princes of Hope..Whateverlah...

Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah

Questions to ask when reviewing the literature

(a) Individual items

  • What is the (empirical) basis of this research?
  • How does the research relate to other research writings on the topic?
  • What theoretical framework is being used?
  • What georaphical area does the research refer to?
  • What social group(s) does the research refer to?
  • When was the research carried out and is it likely still to be empirically valid?

(b)  In relation to the literature as a whole

  • What is the range of research that has been conducted?
  • What methods have generally been used and what methods have been neglected?
  • What, in summary, does the existing research tell us?
  • What, in summary, does the existing research not tell us?
  • What contradictions are there in the literature - either recognised or unrecognised by authors cencerned?
  • What are the deficiencies in the existing research, in substantive or methodological terms?

Reference: Veal, A.J. 1997.  Research Methods for Leisure and Tourism: A Practical Guide. Second Edition. Pearson Education Limited. England.
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah

Blur...blur...what should I write in Literature Review? How to rearrange all the literature that has been reviewed? Finally need to refer to the book again and I found this,"Types of Literature Review". This help me a lot with my writing. Hopefully my writing is good enough ;p.

5 Types of Literature Review

Types of Literature Review

Description

Inclusive

The inclusive approach to reviewing the literature seeks to identify everything that has been written on a particular topic. The compilation of such a bibliography may be a significant achievement in itself, independent of any research project with which it may connected. It becomes a resource to be drawn on in the future by others.

Inclusive/Evaluative

The inclusive/evaluative approach takes the inclusive approach a stage further by providing a commentary on the literature in terms of its coverage and its contribution to knowledge and understanding of the topic. One approach to this topic style of review involves a systematic, quantitative appraisal of the findings of a number of projects focused on the same topic. The technique, known as meta-analysis (Glass et al., 1981), is suitable for the sort of research where findings are directly comparable from one study to another - for example when the key findings are expressed in terms of correlation and regression coefficients.

Exploratory

The exploratory approach is more focused and seeks to discover existing research which might throw light on a specific research question or issue. Comprehensiveness is not as important as the focus on a particular question or issue. The skill in conducting such a review lies in keeping the question or issue in sight, while 'interrogating' the literature for ideas and insights which may help shape the research. The reviewer needs to be open to useful new ideas, but must not be side-tracked into areas which stray too far from the question or issue of interest.

Instrumental

An example of the instrumental approach is the brief review in Case Study. Here the focus of the research is a management issue and the literature is used as a source of suitable ideas on how the research might be tackled. The criterion for selection of literature is not to present a picture of the state of knowledge on the topic, but merely to identify a useful methodology for the project in hand.

Content Analysis & Hermeneutics

Content analysis and hermeneutics are techniques which involve detailed analysis of the contents of a certain body of literature or other documentary source as texts. The text becomes a focus of research in its own right rather than being merely a report of research. The text might be, for example, novels, the speeches of politicians or the contents of advertising. Content analysis tends to be quantitative, involving, for example, counting the number of occurrences of certain phrases. Hermeneutics tends to be qualitative in nature, the term being borrowed from the traditional approach to analysis and interpretation of religious texts.

Reference: Veal, A.J. 1997. Research Methods for Leisure and Tourism: A Practical Guide. Second Edition. Pearson Education Limited. England.
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah

Ni la presentation proposal master aku yang asal...
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah
What do you think of this interpretive booklet? Feel free to give any comment..
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah
This post is still under construction..
anyway feel free to explore and discover the link below and please leave your comments

http://show.zoho.com/public/nurshirley_kamilia/Interpretive-Booklet-Presentation-ppt

http://www.authorstream.com/PresentLive/nurshirley_kamilia-199279-interpretive-booklet-forest-park-presentation-education-ppt-powerpoint


http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/nurshirley_kamilia-199279-interpretive-booklet-forest-park-presentation-education-ppt-powerpoint/
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah
Rasa sayang hey rasa sayang-sayang hey
hey, lihat nona sana sayang sayang hey..

Buah cempedak di luar pagar,
Ambil galah tolong jolokkan,
Saya budak baru belajar,
Kalau salah tolong tunjukkan.


Teringat lagu "Rasa Sayang" yang selalu dinyanyikan ketika masih sekolah rendah, kira-kira 20 tahun yang lepas. Rasanya lagu ni memang tak lapuk ditelan zaman...walaupun umur dah mencapai 30an, lagu tu tetap dekat di hati terutamanya pantun buah cempedak tu..

Zaman dah berubah, umur semakin meningkat, tetapi saya tetap saya dalam pantun tu..tetap budak yang baru belajar...ehmmmm...
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah
No man can reveal to you aught but that which already lies half
asleep in the dawning of your knowledge. The teacher who walks
in the shadow of the temple, among his followers, gives not of his
wisdom but rather of his faith and his lovingness. If he is indeed
wise he does not bid you enter the house of his wisdom, but
rather leads you to the threshold of your own mind.
-Kahlil Gibran
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah
What I fear and desire most in this world is passion.
I fear it because it promises to be spontaneous,
out of my control, unnamed, beyond my reasonable self.
I desire it because passion has color, like the landscape
before me. it is not pale. It is not neutral.
It reveals the backside of the heart.
- Terry Tempest Williams -
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah
Here are soup for my soul, and for anyone else...

Carpe diem: Sieze the day. With every sunrise come new opportunities to experience the world, to enjoy others and to serve them. It is essential to recognize that we are responsible for choosing and defining our lives. We must be open to growth and change - to pursue learning - from books, other people, introspection, our experiences. We should strive toward being proactive; to look at our options and choose wisely. -Beck and Cable in their book Interpretation for the 21st Century-


We're afraid of living life, therefore we don't experience, we don't see. We don't feel. We don't risk. We don't care! And therefore we don't live - because life means being actively involved. Life means getting your hands dirty. Life means jumping in the middle of it all. Life means falling flat on your face. Life means going beyond yourself - into the stars. - Leo Buscaglia-

Reference: Beck, L. and Cable, T. 2002. INTERPRETATION for the 21st Century: Fifteen Guiding Principles for Interpreting Nature & Culture.

Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah
Hello EVERYONE!

Wish YOU all GET SOMETHING from my page.
ENJOY!

Best Regards,
Nurshirley Kamilia Abdullah
Blog Widget by LinkWithin